Impact of pausing elective hip and knee replacement surgery during 2017 on subsequent service provision at a major NHS Trust: a descriptive observational study using interrupted time series.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of a temporary cancellation of elective surgery in winter 2017 on trends in primary hip and knee replacement at a major National Health Service (NHS) Trust, and whether lessons can be learnt about efficient surgery provision. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational descriptive study using interrupted time series analysis of hospital records to explore trends in primary hip and knee replacement surgery at a major NHS Trust, as well as patient characteristics, 2016-2019. INTERVENTION: A temporary cancellation of elective services for 2 months in winter 2017. OUTCOMES: NHS-funded hospital admissions for primary hip or knee replacement, length of stay and bed occupancy. Additionally, we explored the ratio of elective to emergency admissions at the Trust as a measure of elective capacity, and the ratio of public to private provision of NHS-funded hip and knee surgery. RESULTS: After winter 2017, there was a sustained reduction in the number of knee replacements, a decrease in the proportion of most deprived people having knee replacements and an increase in average age for knee replacement and comorbidity for both types of surgery. The ratio of public to private provision dropped after winter 2017, and elective capacity generally has reduced over time. There was clear seasonality in provision of elective surgery, with less complex patients admitted during winter. CONCLUSIONS: Declining elective capacity and seasonality has a marked effect on the provision of joint replacement, despite efficiency improvements in hospital treatment. The Trust has outsourced less complex patients to independent providers, and/or treated them during winter when capacity is most limited. There is a need to explore whether these are strategies that could be used explicitly to maximise the use of limited elective capacity, provide benefit to patients and value for money for taxpayers.

Preliminary insights into patient preparedness for knee or hip arthroplasty: a descriptive survey study.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge-based preparedness for surgery is achieved through education. It is unclear which of brief or extended education programs prior to knee or hip arthroplasty provides better patient preparedness. Using the Patient Preparedness for Surgery survey, we investigated whether people awaiting arthroplasty attending a hospital that provided education over multiple visits via a pre-surgery management program ('Extended') report superior preparedness compared to those attending a hospital in the same health district that only provides education at the pre-admission clinic assessment ('Brief'). RESULTS: A consecutive sample of 128 people (n = 101, 'Extended', n = 27 'Brief') completed the anonymized survey. COVID-19 related service disruptions undermined the sample size, reducing statistical power. The pre-specified superiority of the Extended program (a relative 20% more reporting 'agree'/'strongly agree') was not observed for 'Overall preparedness' [95% (Extended) vs. 89% (Brief), p = 0.36]. Between-group differences exceeding 20% relative superiority were observed for three preparedness sub-domains ['Alternatives explained' (52 vs. 33%, p = 0.09); 'Prepared for home' (85 vs. 57%, p < 0.01); 'Recall of complications' (42 vs 26%, p = 0.14)]. The preliminary findings suggest an extended education program potentially yields better patient-reported preparedness in some preparedness sub-domains, but not all.

Long-term survivorship and results in lower limb arthroplasty: a registry-based comparison study.

INTRODUCTION: Popularity of joint replacement surgery due to ever aging population surges the demand for a proper national joint registry. Our Chinese University of Hong Kong - Prince of Wales Hospital (CUHK-PWH) joint registry has passed the 30th year. The aims of this study are 1) summarize our territory-wide joint registry which has passed the 30th year since establishment and 2) compare our statistics with other major joint registries. METHODS: Part 1 was to review the CUHK-PWH registry. Demographic characteristics of our patients who underwent knee and hip replacements had been summarized. Part 2 was a series of comparisons with registries from Sweden, UK, Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: CUHK-PWH registry captured 2889 primary total knee replacements (TKR) (110 (3.81%) revision) and 879 primary total hip replacements (THR) (107 (12.17%) revision). Median Surgery time of TKR was shorter than THR. Clinical outcome scores were much improved after surgery in both. Uncemented of hybrid in TKR were most popular in Australia (33.4%) and 40% in Sweden and UK. More than half of TKR and THR patients showed the highest percentage with ASA grade 2. New Zealand reflected the best cumulative percentage survival 20 years after surgery of 92.2%, 76.0%, 84.2% survivorship 20 years after TKR, unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and Hip. CONCLUSION: A worldwide accepted patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is recommended to develop to make comparisons among registries and studies feasible. Completeness of registry data is important and useful to improve surgical performance through data comparisons from different regions. Funding from government on sustaining registries is reflected. Registries from Asian countries have yet to be grown and reported.

Changes in epidemiological characteristics of knee arthroplasty in eastern, northern and central China between 2011 and 2020.

OBJECTIVE: To explore changes in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty (KA) over a 10-year period in China. METHODS: Medical records of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), who underwent primary unilateral KA in 5 level I center hospitals in China between January 2011 and December 2020, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. To more clearly define changes over the years, patients were divided into two groups according to time of admission at 5-year intervals. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification, comorbid diseases, surgical procedures, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 23,610 patients with KOA (5400 male and 18,210 females; mean age: 65.7 ± 7.6 years) who underwent primary unilateral KA were included. The number of KAs increased in recent years (group A, n = 7606 vs. group B, n = 16,004). Significant differences were noted in age, sex, BMI, K-L classification, comorbidities, surgical procedures, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs between the two periods (P < 0.05). More than three-quarters of KA cases involved females, and the age at surgery tended to be younger than that reported in foreign countries. In group B, the proportion of overweight and grade III, number of comorbidities, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients increased compared to that in group A; however, hospitalization costs and length of hospital stay decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggested that the epidemiological characteristics of patients undergoing KA have changed over time. An analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of patients undergoing KA treatment may provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of KOA.

Total knee arthroplasty in the outpatient vs inpatient settings: impact of site of care on early postoperative economic and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery performed in the outpatient setting has increased as a result of improved perioperative recovery protocols, bundled payments, and challenges brought by the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on health systems. This study evaluates early postoperative clinical and economic outcomes of patients treated in the inpatient vs outpatient setting using the Attune Knee System (AKS). METHODS: Patients with an elective, primary TKA implanted with the AKS, from Q4 2015 to Q1 2021, were identified within the Premier Healthcare Database. The index was defined as the admission date for inpatient cases and the service day for outpatient procedures. Inpatient and outpatient cases were matched on patient characteristics. Outcomes included 90-day all-cause readmissions, 90-day knee reoperations, and index- and 90-day costs of care. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate outcomes (Reoperation: binomial distribution; costs: Gamma distribution with log link). RESULTS: Before matching, 39,337 inpatient and 9,365 outpatient cases were identified, with greater comorbidities in the inpatient cohort. The outpatient cohort had a lower average Elixhauser Index (EI) compared to the inpatient cohort (1.94 (standard deviation (SD): 1.46) vs 2.17 (SD: 1.53), p < 0.001), and the rates for each individual comorbidities were also slightly lower in the outpatient compared to the inpatient cohorts. Post-match, 9,060 patients were retained in each cohort [mean age: ~ 67, EI = 1.9 (SD: 1.5), 40% male]. Post-match comorbidity rates were similar between inpatient and outpatient cohorts (outpatient EI: 1.94 (SD: 1.44)-inpatient EI: 1.96 (SD: 1.45), p = 0.3516): in both, 54.1% of patients had an EI between 1 and 2, and 5.1% had an EI ≥ 5. No differences were observed in 3-month reoperation rates (0.6% in outpatient, 0.7% in inpatient cohort). Index and post-index 90-day costs were lower in the outpatient vs inpatient cases [(savings for index-only costs: $2,295 (95% CI: $1,977-$2,614); 90 days post-index knee-related care only: $2,540 (95% CI: $2,205-$2,876); 90 days post-index all-cause care: $2,679 (95% CI: $2,322-$3,036)]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to matched inpatient cases, outpatient TKA cases treated with AKS showed similar 90-day outcomes, at lower cost.

Identifying Risk Factors for Complication and Readmission with Same-Day Discharge Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a surge of same-day discharge (SDD) for total joint arthroplasty. However, SDD may not be beneficial for all patients. Therefore, continued investigation into the safety of SDD is necessary as well as risk stratification for improved patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 31,851 elective SDD hip and knee arthroplasties from 2016 to 2020 in a large national database. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient variables and preoperative comorbidities that contribute to postoperative complication or readmission with SDD. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: SDD increased from 1.4% in 2016 to 14.6% in 2020. SDD is associated with lower odds of readmission (AOR: 0.994, CI: 0.992-0.996) and postoperative complications (AOR: 0.998, CI: 0.997-1.000). Patients who have preoperative dyspnea (AOR: 1.03, CI: 1.02-1.04, P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03, P = .002), and hypoalbuminemia (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.00-1.03, P < .001), had higher odds of postoperative complications. Patients who had preoperative dyspnea (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03), hypertension (AOR: 1.01, CI: 1.01-1.03, P = .003), chronic corticosteroid use (AOR: 1.02, CI: 1.01-1.03, P < .001), bleeding disorder (AOR: 1.02; CI: 1.01-1.03, P < .001), and hypoalbuminemia (AOR: 1.01, CI: 1.00-1.02, P = .038), had higher odds of readmission. CONCLUSION: SDD is safe with certain comorbidities. Preoperative screening for cardiopulmonary comorbidities (eg, dyspnea, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic corticosteroid use, bleeding disorder, and hypoalbuminemia may improve SDD outcomes.

A systematic review of cost and well-being in hip and knee replacements surgical site infections.

This systematic review examined peer-reviewed literature published from 2010 to 2020 to investigate the health care system costs, hidden out-of-pocket expenses and quality of life impact of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to develop an overall summary of the burden they place on patients. SSI can significantly impact patients' treatment experience and quality of life. Understanding patients' SSI-related burden may assist in developing more effective strategies aimed at lessening the effects of SSI in financial and well-being consequences. Peer-reviewed articles on adult populations (over 18 years old) in orthopaedic elective hip and knee surgeries published from 2010 to 2020 were considered. Only publications in English and studies conducted in high-income countries were eligible for inclusion. A search strategy based on the MESH term and the CINAHL terms classification was developed. Five databases (Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science) were searched for relevant sources. Reviewers categorised and uploaded identified citations to Covidence and EndNoteX9. Reviewers will assess article titles, abstracts and the full text for compliance with the inclusion criteria. Ongoing discussions between reviewers resolved disagreements at each selection process stage. The final scoping review reported the citation inclusion process and presented search results in a PRISMA flow diagram. Four main themes were extracted from a thematic analysis of included studies (N = 30): Hospital costing (n = 21); Societal perspective of health system costing (n = 2); Patients and societal well-being (n = 6) and Epidemiological database and surveillance (n = 22). This systematic review has synthesised a range of themes associated with the overall incidence and impact of SSI that can inform decision making for policymakers. Further analysis is required to understand the burden on SSI patients.

Overnight joint replacement surgery: a pilot Australian study.

BACKGROUND: With a stretched healthcare system and elective surgery backlog, measures to improve efficiency and decrease costs associated with surgical procedures need to be prioritized. This study compares the benefits of multi-disciplinary involvement in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol-led overnight model following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: Patients in each of two private hospitals undergoing THR or TKR were prospectively enrolled. One hospital (Overnight) was fully committed to the ERAS protocol implementation on all levels and formed the treatment group while in the other hospital (control), patients only had the anaesthetic and operative procedure as part of the ERAS protocol but did not follow the perioperative measures of the protocol. Outcomes on hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation, functional outcomes, satisfaction, adverse events and readmission rates were investigated. RESULTS: Median LOS in the Overnight group was significantly smaller than in the control group (1 vs. 3 days, P < 0.0001). The Overnight group had lower rates of inpatient rehabilitation utilization (4% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.0001), similar improvements in functional hip and knee scores and no increased rate of adverse events or readmission. All patients in both groups were satisfied with their treatment. CONCLUSION: Overnight THR and TKR can safely be performed in the majority of patients, with a multi-disciplinary approach protocol and involvement of all perioperative stakeholders.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oral health and nutritional status of Japanese older adults who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty: A 3-year single-institution retrospective cohort study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the physical and mental health, socioeconomic status, and community behavior of people worldwide. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oral health and nutritional status of Japanese older adults based on the results of preoperative assessment in patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia. This study included older adults (≧65 years) who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty in whom orthopantomography was performed for preoperative oral health assessment, during January 2019 to December 2021. Gender, age, number of family members living together, number of teeth, body mass index, and serum total protein and serum albumin levels were collected for analysis of this study. A total of 201 patients aged 65 to 89 years participated in the study. While the COVID-19 pandemic has had no impact on the oral health status, there has been a drop in serum albumin level from the results of multivariable-adjusted regression analysis considering age, gender, number of family members, and time. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the serum albumin level of Japanese orthopedic patients aged 65 years or older.

Primary hip and knee arthroplasty at district level is safe and may reduce the burden on tertiary care in a low-income setting.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty procedures in low-income countries are mostly performed at tertiary centers, with waiting lists exceeding 12 to 24 months. Recently, this is further exacerbated by the impact of the Covid Pandemic on elective surgeries. Providing arthroplasty services at other levels of healthcare aims to offset this burden, however there is a marked paucity of literature regarding surgical outcomes. This study aims to provide evidence on the safety of arthroplasty at district level. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive hip and knee primary arthroplasty cases performed at a District Hospital (DH), and a Tertiary Academic Hospital (TH) in Cape Town, South Africa between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, surgery related readmissions, reoperations, post-operative complications, and mortality rates were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-five primary arthroplasty surgeries were performed at TH level and 228 at DH level. The average hospital stay was 5.2 ± 2.0 days at DH level and 7.6 ± 7.1 days for TH (p < 0.05). Readmissions within 3 months post-surgery of 1.75% (4 patients) for district and 4.40% (35) for tertiary level (p < 0.05). Reoperation rate of 1 in every 100 patients at the DH and 8.3 in every 100 patients at the TH (p < 0.05). Death rate was 0.4% vs 0.6% at district and tertiary hospitals respectively (p > 0.05). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate was 0.43% at DH and 2.26% at TH. The percentage of hip dislocation requiring revision was 0% at district and 0.37% at tertiary level. During the study period, 228 patients received their arthroplasty surgery at the DH; these patients would otherwise have remained on the TH waiting list. CONCLUSIONS: Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at District health care level is safe and; for the reason that the DH feeds into the TH; providing arthroplasty at district level may help ease the pressure on arthroplasty services at tertiary care facilities in a Southern African context. Adequately trained surgeons should be encouraged to perform these procedures in district hospitals provided there is appropriate patient selection and adherence to strict theatre operating procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective cohort study.

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty]. / Ambulante Versorgung durch sektorübergreifende Prähabilitations- und Rehabilitationskonzepte in der tagesstationären Hüft- und Kniegelenkendoprothetik.

No appeal by a health politician, no matter how insistent, has ever forced all the operational structures of our health-care system to examine their own efficiencies and cost reduction potentials as has SARS-CoV­2. Fast-track surgery, developed long before the current pandemic, can become an indispensable element of modern hospital routines through the integration of interlocked care structures. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcome can be improved by significantly shortening hospital stays, decreasing complication rates, and by additionally strengthening the competence and motivation of the patients involved. Hospital staff could be relieved of heavy workloads, and overall costs could be reduced by involving external prehabilitation centers. It is now necessary to further develop standards for the establishment and implementation of appropriately coordinated prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts for elective total hip and knee replacement surgery and, ideally, to save resources at the same time through regional networking and integration.

One Year Later: The Lasting Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued to generate notable disruption in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in patient characteristics, revenue, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA and TKA after the start of the pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 26,493 patients undergoing primary and revision THA and TKA by 48 surgeons in a single arthroplasty practice. We compared demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, and surgeon revenue from THA and TKA procedures from March 2020 to February 2021 with a prepandemic group undergoing a procedure from March 2019 to February 2020. RESULTS: There was a 20% decline in the volume of all cases in the pandemic group ( 11,688 versus 14,664 , P < 0.001). The postpandemic cohort had shorter length of stay (1.58 versus 1.70 days, P = 0.007), had higher rates of home discharge (98% versus 91%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have their procedure done at an outpatient facility (21% versus 7%, P < 0.001). Even among patients older than 65 years, more pandemic patients underwent a procedure as an outpatient (19% versus 7%, P < 0.001), with no difference in complications or readmissions. Total surgeon charges and payments declined by 17.6% and 16.3%, respectively, during the pandemic ( P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a notable reduction in surgical volume and revenue loss for our practice, we found a marked shift of arthroplasty patients to outpatient facilities with increased rates of home discharge without compromising patient safety.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease-2019 Protocols on Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare expenditures. During the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our institution intensified hygiene standards, including greater glove, personal protective equipment (PPE), and mask use. We assessed the effect of these changes on SSI rates in primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was performed identifying TKA from January 2019 to June 2021 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared before (January 2019 to February 2020) and during (May 2020 to June 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic when no restriction on operative services was in place and were further analyzed during the first (May 2020 to November 2020) and second (December 2020 to June 2021) periods after full operative services were restored. Results: A total of 3,398 pTKA (pre-pandemic: 1,943 [57.2%]; pandemic: 1,455 [42.8%]) and 454 rTKA (pre-pandemic: 229 [50.4%]; pandemic: 225 [49.6%]) were included. For primary cases, superficial and deep SSI rates were similar before and during COVID-19; however, for revision TKA, the incidence of all (-0.32%, p = 0.035) and superficial (-0.32%, p = 0.035) SSIs decreased during COVID-19. Primary TKA had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (LOS; p < 0.001) during COVID-19. Both pTKA (p < 0.001) and rTKA (p = 0.003) were discharged to skilled nursing facilities less frequently during COVID-19 as well. Conclusions: After our hospital implemented COVID-19-motivated hygienic protocols, superficial SSI rates decreased in rTKA but not in pTKA. During COVID-19, patients were less likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities, and pTKA operative times increased. Although these changes occurred during intensified hygiene protocols, further research is needed to determine how these factors contributed to the observed changes.

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on patient-reported outcome measures in Dutch hip and knee arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the first COVID-19 lockdown elective surgery was greatly reduced. Prioritization of patients with greater need and expected benefit in terms of quality of life was advised. The lockdown also potentially affected follow-up outcomes. Therefore, our study compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) retrieved during the lockdown of Dutch primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) patients with previous years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses using national data from the Dutch Orthopaedic Registry (LROI). All primary elective THA and TKA patients with preoperative or postoperative PROMs (EQ-5D-3L index, OHS/OKS) during the first COVID-19 lockdown between March and July 15, 2020 were included. Patients with PROMs during the same months in 2018 plus 2019 were used as control. Finally, 33,453 THA and 27,335 TKA patients were included. Patient characteristics were compared during versus before the lockdown. Subsequently, the lockdown effect on PROMs scores was analyzed with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, THA and TKA patients had a lower age and BMI preoperatively, and more often had surgery in private clinics. Both preoperative PROMs in THA patients, but not in TKA patients, were worse (EQ-5D: Adjusted mean difference (AMD) -0.021, p < 0.001) during the lockdown compared with prior years. Both postoperative PROMs in THA and TKA patients were better during the lockdown (12-month EQ-5D in THA: AMD 0.010, p = 0.003; and in TKA: AMD 0.013, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: During the COVID-19 lockdown, THA patients had slightly worse preoperative PROMs, suggesting selection of patients with greater urgency. Postoperative PROMs in both THA and TKA patients differed minimally. Overall, the observed differences were likely not clinically relevant.

The impact of the pandemic on functional outcomes for joint replacement patients: An observational study.

Elective surgeries, as joint replacement, were resumed after the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in 2020 and a phase of coexistence with the virus began. Surgery was organized in a new way that incorporated procedures aimed at reducing the risk of spreading the virus. The aim of this study is to describe the early functional results for patients undergoing hip and knee replacements at the time healthcare services were being reopened and to compare them with the same outcomes recorded in the prepandemic period. This is a controlled retrospective study. All patients consecutively admitted during 2020 and who underwent hip and knee replacement were enrolled in the study. Patient records from January to March 2020 constituted the prepandemic control group, while patient records from May to December 2020 constituted the study group. Functional recovery was described through the patient's ability to walk using antebrachial devices and to climb up and down 3 steps. The day after surgery on which these activities were first performed was also recorded. The prepandemic group consisted of 183 patients and the pandemic group of 280 patients. The mean age of patients was 66 years (±13.1), female was 44.9% and hip replacement was 66.5%. The number of patients who climbed stairs and the timing thereof was comparable for the 2 groups (68.5% vs 72.2%, respectively; P = .403). There was no significant difference in the incidence of patients able to walk with antebrachial device and incidence of pressure ulcers and major complications. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the incidence of stair climbing was not associated with the prepandemic or pandemic inclusion. During the reopening of orthopedic surgery activity, the reorganization and treatment pathway did not affect the functional outcome achieved by patients underwent joint replacement. Constant monitoring of the functional outcomes will be required so as to further increase the number of joint replacement surgeries.

Cost comparison between spinal versus general anesthesia for hip and knee arthroplasty: an incremental cost study.

PURPOSE: Wait list times for total joint arthroplasties have been growing, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Increasing operating room (OR) efficiency by reducing OR time and associated costs while maintaining quality allows the greatest number of patients to receive care. METHODS: We used propensity score matching to compare parallel processing with spinal anesthesia in a block room vs general anesthesia in a retrospective cohort of adult patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared perioperative costs, hospital costs, OR time intervals, and complications between the groups with nonparametric tests using an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: After matching, we included 636 patients (315 TKA; 321 THA). Median [interquartile range (IQR)] perioperative costs were CAD 7,417 [6,521-8,109], and hospital costs were CAD 10,293 [9,344-11,304]. Perioperative costs were not significantly different between groups (pseudo-median difference [MD], CAD -47 (95% confidence interval [CI], -214 to -130; P = 0.60); nor were total hospital costs (MD, CAD -78; 95% CI, -340 to 178; P = 0.57). Anesthesia-controlled time and total intraoperative time were significantly shorter for spinal anesthesia (MD, 14.6 min; 95% CI, 13.4 to 15.9; P < 0.001; MD, 15.9; 95% CI, 11.0 to 20.9; P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in complications. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia in the context of a dedicated block room reduced both anesthesia-controlled time and total OR time. This did not translate into a reduction in incremental cost in the spinal anesthesia group.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les temps d'attente pour les arthroplasties articulaires totales ont augmenté, en particulier à la suite de la pandémie de COVID-19. Une augmentation de l'efficacité de la salle d'opération (SOP) fondée sur une réduction du temps en salle d'opération et des coûts associés, tout en maintenant la qualité, permettrait à un plus grand nombre de patients de recevoir des soins. MéTHODE: Nous avons utilisé l'appariement par score de propension pour comparer en parallèle des traitements par rachianesthésie dans une salle de bloc vs par anesthésie générale dans une cohorte rétrospective de patients adultes bénéficiant d'une arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH) et d'une arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG) primaires. Nous avons comparé les coûts périopératoires, les coûts hospitaliers, les intervalles de temps en SOP et les complications entre les groupes avec des tests non paramétriques en utilisant une approche d'intention de traiter. RéSULTATS: Après appariement, nous avons inclus 636 patients (315 ATG; 321 ATH). Les coûts périopératoires médians [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)] étaient de 7417 $ CA [6521 ­ 8109] et les coûts hospitaliers de 10 293 $ CA [9344 ­ 11 304]. Les coûts périopératoires n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les groupes (différence pseudomédiane [DM], −47 $ CA (intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC], −214 à −130; P = 0,60), pas plus que les coûts hospitaliers totaux (DM, −78 $ CA; IC 95 %, −340 à 178; P = 0,57). Le temps sous anesthésie et le temps peropératoire total étaient significativement plus courts pour la rachianesthésie (DM, 14,6 min; IC 95 %, 13,4 à 15,9; P < 0,001; DM, 15,9; IC 95 %, 11,0 à 20,9; P < 0,001, respectivement). Aucune différence significative n'a été observée dans les complications. CONCLUSION: La rachianesthésie dans un contexte de salle de bloc dédiée a réduit à la fois le temps sous anesthésie et le temps total de SOP. Cela ne s'est pas traduit par une réduction du coût différentiel dans le groupe recevant une rachianesthésie.

Virtual arthroplasty clinic: a single centre experience: commentary on progress, cost savings and patient retention.

BACKGROUND: The COVID pandemic highlights utility of remote patient follow-up. We observe a Virtual Clinic (VC) follow-up model for arthroplasty used at a metropolitan hospital. Patients aged <70 that exhibit no issues in face-to-face review (F2F) progress to VC. We aimed to review VC's cost-effectiveness, and identify potential improvements to patient allocation and retention. METHOD: A retrospective database was collated of all hip and knee joint arthroplasties performed at Frankston Hospital over a 12-month period in 2017-2018. Patient encounters were followed from operation to discharge from F2F and, if appropriate, VC (involving imaging and a paper-based qualitative questionnaire). VC attendance was compared to that of the year in which it was introduced (2014). The Clinical Costings Department provided average hospital spending for each of these modes of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 516 joint arthroplasties performed, 500 attended outpatient clinic (OPC). There were 884 F2F appointments (average 1.7 per person, range 0-12). One-hundred-and-fifty-four arthroplasties were correctly assigned to subsequent VC as per protocol (30%). Completed VC responses were received for 86 arthroplasties (56% response rate). In the period studied, VC attendance increased significantly compared to the year following introduction (36-56%, p < 0.05), with the questionnaire revealing a high-level of patient satisfaction for this method of follow-up. Over the period studied, we estimate VC has saved $250 000 and 300 review hours from OPC. CONCLUSION: Implementing VC for follow-up of arthroplasty may demonstrate a method of saving hospital resources. Appropriate early enrolment of patients to reduce F2F burden, and VC retention, should be encouraged.

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rates of Ninety-Day Peri-Prosthetic Joint and Surgical Site Infections after Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Background: The impact of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the rate of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and superficial surgical site infections (SSI) is currently unknown. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate any changes in the rates of 90-day PJI or 30-day SSI, including trends in microbiology of the infections, during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the three years prior. Patients and Methods: An Institutional Review Board-approved, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted with five participating academic institutions across two healthcare systems in the northeastern United States. Primary TJA patients from the years 2017-2019 were grouped as a pre-COVID-19 pandemic cohort and patients from the year 2020 were grouped as a COVID-19 pandemic cohort. Differences in patient demographics, PJI, SSI, and microbiology between the two cohorts were assessed. Results: A total of 14,844 TJAs in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic cohort and 5,453 TJAs in the COVID-19 pandemic cohort were evaluated. There were no substantial differences of the combined 90-day PJI and 30-day superficial SSI rates between the pre-COVID-19 pandemic cohort (0.35%) compared with the COVID-19 pandemic cohort (0.26%; p = 0.303). Conclusions: This study did not find any change in the rates of 90-day PJI or 30-day superficial SSI in patients undergoing primary TJA between a pre-COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic cohort. Larger national database studies may identify small but substantial differences in 90-day PJI and 30-day superficial SSI rates between these two time periods. Our data may support continued efforts to maintain high compliance with hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, and limited hospital visitation whenever possible.

Reduction in hospital length of stay and increased utilization of telemedicine during the "return-to-normal" period of the COVID-19 pandemic does not adversely influence early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total hip replacement: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Elective total hip replacement (THR) was halted in our institution during the COVID-19 surge in March 2020. Afterwards, elective THR volume increased with emphasis on fast-track protocols, early discharge, and post-discharge virtual care. We compare early outcomes during this "return-to-normal period" with those of a matched pre-pandemic cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 757 patients undergoing THR from June to August 2020, who were matched 1:1 with a control cohort from June to August 2019. Length of stay (LOS) for the study cohort was lower than the control cohort (31 vs. 45 hours; p < 0.001). The time to first postoperative physical therapy (PT) was shorter in the study cohort (370 vs. 425 minutes; p < 0.001). More patients were discharged home in the study cohort (99% vs. 94%; p < 0.001). Study patients utilized telehealth office and rehabilitation services 14 times more frequently (39% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.001). Outcomes included post-discharge 90-day unscheduled office visits, emergency room (ER) visits, complications, readmissions, and PROMs (HOOS JR, and VR-12 mental/physical). Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: Rates of 90-day unscheduled outpatient visits (5.0% vs. 7.3%), ER visits (5.0% vs. 4.8%), hospital readmissions (4.0% vs. 2.8%), complications (0.04% vs. 0.03%), and 3-month PROMs were similar between cohorts. There was no 90-day mortality. INTERPRETATION: A reduction in LOS and increased telehealth use for office and rehabilitation visits did not adversely influence 90-day clinical outcomes and PROMs. Our findings lend further support for the utilization of fast-track arthroplasty with augmentation of postoperative care delivery using telemedicine.

Consequences for preoperative pain and function when postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus outbreak causes postponement of elective surgery. We evaluated how pain, function and general health were impacted by postponing elective knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis with no known surgery rescheduling date due to the coronavirus outbreak. METHODS: This study included 194 patients from a Danish public hospital with postponed elective primary knee or hip arthroplasty due to the lockdown. Patients responded to questionnaires when their surgery was cancelled and before surgery. Changes in pain and function were evaluated with the Oxford Knee and Hip Scores (OKS, OHS) and their general health with the EuroQol 5-dimension scale (EQ5D). Additionally, we asked about the patients' concerns and whether they felt improved, unchanged or deteriorated during the waiting period. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 110 (57%) patients, 59 and 51 awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty (median age 71 years, 62% were female), respectively. Arthroplasty was postponed for a median (range) 98 (63-161) days. A total of 34% were concerned that the postponement would lead to a poorer outcome. Mean OKS and OHS differences were 0 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1-1) and -1 (95% CI: -2-0) from surgery cancellation to re-scheduled surgery. The mean EQ5D index difference was 0.0 (95% CI: 0.0-0.1) for both groups. A total of 75 (68%) patients felt an important deterioration of their condition. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operatively, patients worried about experiencing an altered treatment outcome due to postponed surgery and felt that their condition had deteriorated during the waiting period although this was not reflected in patient-reported outcome measures. FUNDING: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.